A Political Agency Theory of Central Bank Independence
We propose a simple theory to explain why, and under what circumstances, a politician delegates policy tasks to a technocrat in an independent institution and then analyze under what conditions delegation is optimal for society. Our theory builds on Holmström's (1982, 1999)"hidden effort" principal-agent model. The election pressures that politicians face, and the absence of such pressures for technocrats, give rise to a dynamic incentive structure that formalizes two rationales for delegation, one highlighted by Hamilton (1788) and the other by Blinder (1998). Delegation trades off the cost of having a possibly incompetent technocrat with a long-term job contract against the benefit of having a technocrat who (i) invests more effort into the specialized policy task and (ii) is better insulated from the whims of public opinion. A natural application of our framework suggests a new theory of central bank independence. Copyright (c) 2010 The Ohio State University.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | EGGERTSSON, GAUTI B. ; BORGNE, ERIC LE |
Published in: |
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. - Blackwell Publishing. - Vol. 42.2010, 4, p. 647-677
|
Publisher: |
Blackwell Publishing |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Dynamic Incentives and the Optimal Delegation of Political Power
Borgne, Eric Le, (2007)
-
A Political Agency Theory of Central Bank Independence
Eggertsson, Gauti B., (2003)
-
DO ELECTIONS ALWAYS NOTIVATE INCUMBENTS? LEARNING VS CAREER CONCERNS
Borgne, Eric Le, (2004)
- More ...