Aggressive oil extraction and precautionary saving: Coping with volatility
The effects of stochastic oil demand on optimal oil extraction paths and tax, spending and government debt policies are analyzed when the oil demand schedule is linear and preferences quadratic. Without prudence, optimal oil extraction is governed by the Hotelling rule and optimal budgetary policies by the tax and consumption smoothing principle. Volatile oil demand brings forward oil extraction and induces a bigger government surplus. With prudence, the government depletes oil reserves even more aggressively and engages in additional precautionary saving financed by postponing spending and bringing taxes forward, especially if it has substantial monopoly power on the oil market, gives high priority to the public spending target, is very prudent, and future oil demand has high variance. Uncertain economic prospects induce even higher precautionary saving and, if non-oil revenue shocks and oil revenue shocks are positively correlated, even more aggressive oil extraction. In contrast, prudent governments deliberately underestimate oil reserves which induce less aggressive oil depletion and less government saving, but less so if uncertainty about reserves and oil demand are positively correlated.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | van der Ploeg, Frederick |
Published in: |
Journal of Public Economics. - Elsevier, ISSN 0047-2727. - Vol. 94.2010, 5-6, p. 421-433
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Hotelling rule Tax smoothing Prudence Vigorous oil extraction Precautionary saving Taxation and under-spending Oil price volatility Uncertain economic prospects and oil reserves |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Exchange rate bands and optimal monetary accommodation under a dirty float
Beetsma, Roel, (1992)
-
Is there really a Green Paradox?
van der Ploeg, Frederick, (2010)
-
Robustness of a Simple Rule for the Social Cost of Carbon
Rezai, Armon, (2014)
- More ...