Alarmist Decisions with Divergent Risk Information.
Receipt of multiple sources of risk information ideally should foster sounder decisions under uncertainty. This paper's original survey results for environmental risks suggest that the learning process is reasonable in many respects but it does not accord with a rational Bayesian learning model. Divergent risk assessments from different sources produce extreme violations of rationality, as there is inordinate weight on the high risk assessment. This alarmist reaction holds for both government and industry information sources. This phenomenon may account for the commonly observed phenomenon of public overreaction to highly publicized risks. Copyright 1997 by Royal Economic Society.
Year of publication: |
1997
|
---|---|
Authors: | Viscusi, W Kip |
Published in: |
Economic Journal. - Royal Economic Society - RES, ISSN 1468-0297. - Vol. 107.1997, 445, p. 1657-70
|
Publisher: |
Royal Economic Society - RES |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Role of Publication Selection Bias in Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life
Viscusi, W Kip, (2014)
-
The General-Liability Reform Experiments and the Distribution of Insurance-Market Outcomes.
Viscusi, W Kip, (1995)
-
Frameworks for Analyzing the Effects of Risk and Environmental Regulations on Productivity.
Viscusi, W Kip, (1983)
- More ...