Always look at the bright side of non-delivery: WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements, yesterday and today
The disciplining of Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) by the WTO has been ‘relaxed’ recently as a result of the new context (the <italic>Transparency Mechanism</italic>) within which notified PTAs are being multilaterally reviewed. This is probably a blessing for a number of reasons, including the success of the multilateral trading system in bringing tariffs down over the years (and the ensuing reduced trade diversion), the fact that modern PTAs deal with many non-trade issues as well (for which no WTO disciplines exist), and the recent empirical literature suggesting overall positive welfare implications for those participating in similar schemes. This paper discusses these and other reasons to support the view that the WTO should rather focus on the multilateral agenda instead of diverting its attention towards disciplining PTAs. In more concrete terms, this paper argues in support of the thesis that the <italic>Transparency Mechanism</italic> should not be simply a <italic>de facto</italic> substitute of the previous regime (where outlawing a PTA could not <italic>a priori</italic> be excluded), but the <italic>de jure</italic> new forum to discuss PTAs within the multilateral trading system, at least for the time being. A first do-no-harm-policy is one of the rationales for the thesis advocated here.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | MAVROIDIS, PETROS C. |
Published in: |
World Trade Review. - Cambridge University Press. - Vol. 10.2011, 03, p. 375-387
|
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Description of contents: | Abstract [journals.cambridge.org] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2006: Some Descriptive Statistics
Horn, Henrik, (2008)
-
Burden of Proof in Environmental Disputes in the WTO: Legal Aspects
Horn, Henrik, (2009)
-
Black Cat, White Cat: The Identity of the WTO Judges
Johannesson, Louise, (2015)
- More ...