An Empirical Comparison of Bankruptcy Models.
Four types of bankruptcy prediction models based on financial statement ratios, cash flows, stock returns, and return standard deviations are compared. Based on a ample of bankruptcies from 1980 to 1991, results indicate that no existing model of bankruptcy adequately captures the data. During the last fiscal year preceding bankruptcy, none of the individual models may be excluded without a loss in explanatory power. If considered in isolation, the cash flow model discriminates most consistently two to three years before bankruptcy. By comparison, the ratio model is the best single model during the year immediately preceding bankruptcy. Quasi-jack-knifing procedures suggest that none of the models can reliably predict bankruptcy more than two years in advance. Copyright 1998 by MIT Press.
Year of publication: |
1998
|
---|---|
Authors: | Mossman, Charles E, et al |
Published in: |
The Financial Review. - Eastern Finance Association - EFA. - Vol. 33.1998, 2, p. 35-53
|
Publisher: |
Eastern Finance Association - EFA |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Find similar items by using search terms and synonyms from our Thesaurus for Economics (STW).