Analysen und Berichte
Enste and Wicher suggest that political regulation is always wealth-reducing. However, their analysis neglects various relevant determinants of the wealth indicator. Economic wealth cannot be estimated from the quantity of regulation, as quality and other aspects matter. Hence, political acumen is required. Enste and Wicher reply to criticism of the regulation index and the analysis of the impact of regulation on education. They argue that they neither ignore the positive effects of regulation (taken into account with the data on good governance indicators) nor demand a zero regulation policy. Instead, the main goal of the analysis is to provide an international comparison for “better regulation”. Copyright ZBW and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Year of publication: |
2013
|
---|---|
Authors: | Schöbel, Enrico ; Petersen, Lars ; Enste, Dominik ; Wicher, Jochen |
Published in: |
Wirtschaftsdienst. - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft (ZBW). - Vol. 93.2013, 4, p. 267-271
|
Publisher: |
Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft (ZBW) |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Schöbel, Enrico, (2013)
-
Die beste Bildungspolitik ist ein gute Ordnungspolitik : eine Erwiderung
Enste, Dominik, (2013)
-
Wohlstand und Regulierung : (k)ein entweder oder? – eine Replik
Schöbel, Enrico, (2013)
- More ...