Analysts' Rationality and Forecast Bias: Evidence from Sales Forecasts.
When optimistic forecasts can improve access to management, rational analysts have incentives to issue optimistically-biased forecasts (Lim, 2001). This paper proposes that the extent of this optimistic forecast bias will depend on the forecast's importance to management. If management attaches less importance to a forecasted measure, analysts should decrease their forecast bias because the expected benefits of issuing optimistic forecasts are less. We examine analysts' earnings and sales forecasts, and predict that analysts' optimistic bias will be greater for earnings than for sales. Results are consistent with our predictions and contribute to the evidence that analysts' forecast bias is rational and intentional. Copyright 2003 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
| Year of publication: |
2003
|
|---|---|
| Authors: | Mest, David P ; Plummer, Elizabeth |
| Published in: |
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. - Springer. - Vol. 21.2003, 2, p. 103-22
|
| Publisher: |
Springer |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Evidence on the distributional effects of a land value tax on residential households
Plummer, Elizabeth, (2010)
-
The effects of state funding on property tax rates and school construction
Plummer, Elizabeth, (2006)
-
Incentive effects of the investment tax credit : evidence from analysts' forecasts
Plummer, Elizabeth, (2000)
- More ...