Are "Decoupled" Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation
This analysis utilizes farm-level data to evaluate the extent to which U.S. farm program benefits, particularly direct payments, bring about distortions in production. The issue is important in WTO negotiations and in the debate over the distortionary effects of decoupled ("green-box") payments. Our results suggest that the distortions brought about by AMTA payments, though statistically significant in some cases, are very modest. Larger effects are implied for market loss assistance payments. Probit models suggest that AMTA payments do not influence the likelihood that agents will acquire more land. Our results are reinforced using an aggregate county-level acreage model. Copyright 2006 American Agricultural Economics Association.
Year of publication: |
2006
|
---|---|
Authors: | Goodwin, Barry K. ; Mishra, Ashok K. |
Published in: |
American Journal of Agricultural Economics. - American Agricultural Economics Association. - Vol. 88.2006, 1, p. 73-89
|
Publisher: |
American Agricultural Economics Association |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Discussion of agricultural land values, government payments, and production
Phipps, Timothy T., (2003)
-
Are “Decoupled” Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation
Goodwin, Barry K., (2006)
-
Another Look at Decoupling: Additional Evidence on the Production Effects of Direct Payments
Goodwin, Barry K., (2005)
- More ...