Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination
We study race in the labor market by sending fictitious resumes to help-wanted ads in Boston and Chicago newspapers. To manipulate perceived race, resumes are randomly assigned African-American- or White-sounding names. White names receive 50 percent more callbacks for interviews. Callbacks are also more responsive to resume quality for White names than for African-American ones. The racial gap is uniform across occupation, industry, and employer size. We also find little evidence that employers are inferring social class from the names. Differential treatment by race still appears to still be prominent in the U. S. labor market.
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Bertrand, Marianne ; Mullainathan, Sendhil |
Published in: |
American Economic Review. - American Economic Association - AEA. - Vol. 94.2004, 4, p. 991-1013
|
Publisher: |
American Economic Association - AEA |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
What's advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment
Bertrand, Marianne, (2008)
-
What's Psychology Worth? A Field Experiment in the Consumer Credit Market
Bertrand, Marianne, (2005)
-
Is there discretion in wage setting? : A test using takeover legislation
Bertrand, Marianne, (1998)
- More ...