Are flexible contracts bad for workers? Evidence from job satisfaction data
If workers can choose between permanent and flexible contracts, compensating wage differentials should arise to equalize on-the-job utility in the two types of contracts. Estimating job satisfaction using the British Household Panel Survey shows that agency and casual contracts are associated with routinely lower satisfaction. This results because the low job satisfaction associated with less job security is not offset by higher compensation or other job characteristics. Job security is sufficiently important that holding constant this one facet of satisfaction eliminates the overall gap in job satisfaction between flexible and permanent contracts.
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | Green, Colin ; Heywood, J S |
Institutions: | Department of Economics, Management School |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Does profit sharing increase training by reducing turnover?
Green, Colin, (2007)
-
Profit Sharing and the Quality of Relations with the Boss
Green, Colin, (2008)
-
Performance pay, sorting and the dimensions of job satisfaction
Green, Colin, (2007)
- More ...