Are lifecycle funds appropriate as default options in participant-directed retirement plans?
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Basu, Anup K. ; Chen, En Te ; Clements, Adam |
Published in: |
Economics Letters. - Elsevier, ISSN 0165-1765. - Vol. 124.2014, 1, p. 51-54
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Subject: | Default option | Lifecycle funds | Retirement wealth | Asset allocation | Prospect theory |
Type of publication: | Article |
---|---|
Classification: | D03 - Behavioral Economics; Underlying Principles ; G11 - Portfolio Choice ; G17 - Financial Forecasting ; J26 - Retirement; Retirement Policies ; J32 - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Private Pensions |
Source: |
-
Are lifecycle funds appropriate as default options in participant-directed retirement plans?
Basu, Anup K., (2014)
-
Appropriateness of Default Investment Options in Defined Contribution Plans: The Australian Evidence
Basu, Anup, (2006)
-
Villatoro, FĂ©lix, (2014)
- More ...
-
Are lifecycle funds appropriate as default options in participant-directed retirement plans?
Basu, Anup K., (2014)
-
Basu, Anup K., (2023)
-
Distance bias of socially responsible investment
Chen, En Te, (2018)
- More ...