Assessing the Validity of Randomized Field Experiments
Randomized field experiments are often logistical failures. They are particularly difficult to implement when the intervention involves a large number of components or service providers. Although surmountable, potential methodological problems with using randomized experiments to evaluate intervention programs under field (i.e., real world) conditions must be anticipated and resolved for the experiment to succeed. This article examines six potential major problems: treatment dilution, treatment contamination or confounding, inaccurate caseflow and power estimates, violations of the random assignment process, changes in the environmental context, and changes in the treatment regimens. It describes the general problem, several methodological developments related to them, and how the authors are attempting to deal with these problems in an experiment at the Research Triangle Institute. Developing designs and implementation strategies to deal with these six problems is crucial to extending the usefulness of randomized field experiments to evaluate social policies and experiments.
Year of publication: |
1990
|
---|---|
Authors: | Dennis, Michael L. |
Published in: |
Evaluation Review. - Vol. 14.1990, 4, p. 347-373
|
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Adolescent marijuana use and school attendance
Roebuck, M. Christopher, (2004)
-
Dennis, Michael L., (2001)
-
Cost analysis of training and employment services in methadone treatment
French, Michael T., (1994)
- More ...