Bankruptcy Costs and the Design of Preventive Restructuring Procedures

A European directive requires Member States to give firms access to preventive restructuringprocedures. This paper assesses the interest of a procedure distinct from that for insolvent firms. Itis based on the French experience, where a preventive procedure has coexisted with the morecommon restructuring procedure since 2006. The spatial and temporal heterogeneity of theCommercial Courts' decisions allows the identification of the causal impact of the conversion fromthe preventive procedure to the common one on the firm's survival chances. Using an (almost)exhaustive sample of preventive bankruptcy fillings over 2010-2016, we show that conversionreduces the probability of firm survival by 50 p.p., which corresponds to indirect bankruptcy costsof around 20% of the firm assets. Our interpretation is that the low restructuring rate under thecommon bankruptcy procedure may alarm some of the firm's stakeholders, especially its customers.This in turn aggravates the firm's difficulties and reduces its chances of restructuring under thecommon procedure. We provide some empirical evidence to support this interpretation. A distinctpreventive procedure helps prevent this spiral.3