Behavioral and Welfare Effects of Tournaments and Fixed Performance Contracts: Some Experimental Evidence
Using experimental economics, we compare the efficiency and welfare effects of tournaments and fixed performance contracts. Our subjects (agents) were generally better off under fixed performance contracts, but the advantage of the fixed performance contract disappears if the relative magnitude of the standard deviation of the common shock exceeds a critical value. Efficiency wise, agents tend to exert higher effort under fixed performance contracts, on average. Additionally, an increase in the common shock standard deviation appeared to be associated with lower effort under tournaments. Our results shed light on the potential impact of legislative proposals to ban tournament contracts. Copyright 2005 American Agricultural Economics Association.
Year of publication: |
2005
|
---|---|
Authors: | Wu, Steven ; Roe, Brian |
Published in: |
American Journal of Agricultural Economics. - American Agricultural Economics Association. - Vol. 87.2005, 1, p. 130-146
|
Publisher: |
American Agricultural Economics Association |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Tournaments, fairness, and risk
Wu, Steven, (2006)
-
Wu, Steven, (2005)
-
Tournaments, Fairness, and Risk
Wu, Steven, (2006)
- More ...