Beyond 'zero sum': the case for context in regulating zero rating in the global South
Critics contend that zero rating (ZR) imperils network neutrality, while proponents defend ZR as an internet on-ramp for billions. Prevailing voices have thus reduced zero rating to a zero sum game. As a corrective, this paper argues that instead of siloing the issues of network neutrality and the digital divide, and their relationship to zero rating, these sets of concerns must be drawn into a nuanced debate with one another. To advance this approach, I analyse the multiple forms of ZR offered in four wireless markets – Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and South Africa - across two dimensions: political-economic and developmental. I make the resulting case that through granular contextualisation, we should recognise the complexity of factors related to network neutrality and digital inclusion in order to arrive at an informed appraisal of this pervasive, and divisive, form of mobile internet access.
Year of publication: |
2019
|
---|---|
Authors: | Hoskins, Guy Thurston |
Published in: |
Internet Policy Review. - Berlin : Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, ISSN 2197-6775. - Vol. 8.2019, 1, p. 1-26
|
Publisher: |
Berlin : Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society |
Subject: | zero-rating | Network neutrality | Digital inclusion | Regulation |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Offering zero-rated content in the shadow of net neutrality
Colangelo, Giuseppe, (2021)
-
Internet regulation, two-sided pricing, and sponsored data
Jullien, Bruno, (2018)
-
Zero-rating and vertical content foreclosure
Jeitschko, Thomas D., (2021)
- More ...