Bias and efficiency of single versus double bound models for contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo analysis
The dichotomous choice contingent valuation method can be used either in the single or double bound formulation. The former is easier to implement, while the latter is known to be more efficient. We analyse the bias of the ML estimates produced by either model, and the gain in efficiency associated to the double bound model, in different experimental settings. We find that there are no relevant differences in point estimates given by the two models, even for small sample size. The greater efficiency of the double bound is confirmed, although differences tend to reduce by increasing the sample size. Provided that a reliable pretest is conducted, and the sample size is large, use of the single rather than the double bound model is warranted.
Year of publication: |
2000
|
---|---|
Authors: | Calia, Pinuccia ; Strazzera, Elisabetta |
Published in: |
Applied Economics. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0003-6846. - Vol. 32.2000, 10, p. 1329-1336
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Calia, Pinuccia, (1999)
-
A sample selection model for protest votes in contingent valuation analyses
Calia, Pinuccia, (1999)
-
Modelling zero bids in contingent valuation surveys
Strazzera, Elisabetta, (2000)
- More ...