Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
This paper investigates choices about ``distributional fairness'' (sometimes called ``distributive justice''), i.e., selection of the proper way for resources to be distributed in group. The study finds evidence that several of the same biases of risky decision making also apply to choices about distributional fairness, in particular focusing on the key biases that lead to prospect theory. This finding is achieved by introducing a novel thought experiment regarding the fairness of resource distributions, then manipulating the percentage of individuals who gain or lose in these distributions, and changing the sizes of gains and losses. Shared biases may mean similar heuristics are being employed. The mechanism behind this result leaves room for future exploration, as do the implications of the finding for related applications in inequality research.
Year of publication: |
2015
|
---|---|
Authors: | Michaelson, Zachary |
Published in: |
Judgment and Decision Making. - Society for Judgment and Decision Making, ISSN 1930-2975. - Vol. 10.2015, 2, p. 198-203
|
Publisher: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making |
Subject: | distributional fairness | Allais paradox | isolation effect | certainty effect | peanuts effect | inequality | reflection effect | prospect theory |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
The effects of losses and event splitting on the Allais paradox
Weber, Bethany, (2007)
-
Choice architects reveal a bias toward positivity and certainty
Daniels, David P., (2019)
-
Reconsidering the common ratio effect: the roles of compound independence, reduction, and coalescing
Schmidt, Ulrich, (2014)
- More ...