Extent: | Online-Ressource (160 p) |
---|---|
Series: | |
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | Description based upon print version of record Cover; CONTENTS; ABBREVIATIONS; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; OVERVIEW; MANAGEMENT RESPONSE; CHAIRPERSON'S SUMMARY; STATEMENT BY THE EXTERNAL EXPERT PANEL; 1. CONTEXT AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; TABLES; Table 1.1 Evolution of Private Sector Monitoring and Evaluation, 1995-2012; M&E Systems for Development Results in IFC and MIGA; BOXES; Box 1.1 IFC and MIGA's Past Management Actions against IEG Recommendations; Table 1.2 Self-Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of IFC and MIGA; Normative Standard for Assessing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems and Evaluation Framework; FIGURES; Figure 1.1 Results Chain of M&E Table 1.3 Methodologies to Evaluate IFC and MIGA's M&E SystemsNotes; References; 2. MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN IFC AND MIGA; Monitoring and Evaluation for IFC Investment Operations; Table 2.1 Flags Used in DOTS Quality Control; Self-Evaluation of IFC Investments; Box 2.1 Coverage of Annual Report External Assurance: Details; Figure 2.1 Percentage of XPSRs Judged by IEG to Be "Good Practice"; Figure 2.2 Development Outcome Success Rates and Differences between XPSR Self-Evaluation and IEG Rating Figure 2.3 Work Quality Success Rates and Differences between XPSR Self-Evaluation and IEG RatingTable 2.2 DOTS, XPSR, and IEG Development Outcome Ratings on Binary Basis; Box 2.2 Evaluation Cooperation Group Benchmarking of IFC's and MIGA's Evaluation Systems; Monitoring and Evaluation for IFC Advisory Services; Figure 2.4 M&E Quality at Entry, 2008-10; Figure 2.5 Project Supervision Documents Quality; Figure 2.6 PCR Information Quality; Figure 2.7 Adequacy of Information to Justify Ratings Figure 2.8 PCR Self-Rating, CDI and IEG Ratings for Subset of Projects Having Three Different Rating Sources on Binary BasisThematic Evaluations at IFC; IFC's Evaluation Strategy; Corporate Monitoring and Evaluation; Monitoring and Evaluation in MIGA; Notes; References; 3. USE AND INFLUENCE OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN IFC AND MIGA; Use of Monitoring and Evaluation in IFC Projects; Box 3.1 XPSR Lessons; Table 3.1 Unidentified Lessons in Unsuccessful Projects; Box 3.2 Incorporating Lessons in Agribusiness Projects; Figure 3.1 Trends in IFC's E&S Appraisal Work Quality Evaluated 2004-11 Figure 3.2 Trends in IFC's E&S Supervision Work Quality Evaluated 2004-11Integrating Development Results into Staff Incentive Structures in IFC; Table 3.2 Gaps and Targets at Bottom of the Pyramid in Latin America and the Caribbean; Box 3.3 Lessons from a Cluster Review of Extractive Industries Projects; Box 3.4 Integrated Approach to Microfinance in Afghanistan; Table 3.3 Reach or Outcome Indicators in Regional Strategies; Use of Monitoring and Evaluation in MIGA Guarantee Projects and Strategy; Notes; References; 4. EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEMS Effectiveness of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in IFC and MIGA |
ISBN: | 978-0-8213-9918-7 ; 978-0-8213-9919-4 ; 978-0-8213-9918-7 |
Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012677216