Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload
The choice overload hypothesis states that an increase in the number of options to choose from may lead to adverse consequences such as a decrease in the motivation to choose or the satisfaction with the finally chosen option. A number of studies found strong instances of choice overload in the lab and in the field, but others found no such effects or found that more choices may instead facilitate choice and increase satisfaction. In a meta-analysis of 63 conditions from 50 published and unpublished experiments (N = 5,036), we found a mean effect size of virtually zero but considerable variance between studies. While further analyses indicated several potentially important preconditions for choice overload, no sufficient conditions could be identified. However, some idiosyncratic moderators proposed in single studies may still explain when and why choice overload reliably occurs; we review these studies and identify possible directions for future research. (c) 2010 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Scheibehenne, Benjamin ; Greifeneder, Rainer ; Todd, Peter M. |
Published in: |
Journal of Consumer Research. - University of Chicago Press. - Vol. 37.2010, 3, p. 409-425
|
Publisher: |
University of Chicago Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Commentary on Scheibehenne, Greifeneder, and Todd: Choice overload : is there anything to it?
Chernev, Alexander, (2010)
-
Can there ever be too many options? : a meta‐analytic review of choice overload
Scheibehenne, Benjamin, (2010)
-
What moderates the too-much-choice effect?
Scheibehenne, Benjamin, (2009)
- More ...