Canada: The Supreme Court Sets Rules for the Secession of Quebec
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in 1998 that neither the Canadian constitution nor international law allows Quebec to secede from Canada unilaterally. Secession would require amending the constitution. However, if a clear majority of Quebecers unambiguously opts for secession, the federal government and the other provinces would have a constitutional duty to negotiate. This is an obligation that the court declared to be implicit in four principles that “inform and sustain the constitutional text”—federalism, democracy, constitutionalism and the rule of law, and respect for minorities. The same set of principles would govern the negotiations themselves. Accordingly, Quebec could not dictate the terms of secession, and one cannot assume that agreement would be reached. If negotiations fail, and Quebec declares independence unilaterally, the international community would have to decide whether Quebec's action was legitimate. Copyright , Oxford University Press.
Authors: | Leslie, Peter |
---|---|
Published in: |
Publius: The Journal of Federalism. - Oxford University Press, ISSN 0048-5950. - Vol. 29, 2, p. 135-151
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Maastricht model : a Canadian perspective on the European Union
Leslie, Peter M., (1996)
-
Federal state, national economy
Leslie, Peter M., (1987)
-
Economic integration and equality in federations : the case of Canada
Brown, Douglas M., (1994)
- More ...