Category Structure and Organizational Theory
This paper asks how the structuring of categories and their social location can impact organisational theory in general and institutional theory in particular. Following Bourdieu, we divide categories into two classes, namely those within the field, and those within the habitus (i.e. within the minds of individuals). For categories in the field, the category structure is rarely important, and it is often useful to assume all category members are equivalent. For categories in the habitus however, closely considering the structure of the category, and particularly its grading, provides conceptual and methodological tools for understanding several aspects of institutional behavior, and for linking institutional theory to micro-level organizational theories. We demonstrate our arguments by reviewing three previously-published studies and by analyzing the adoption of Manufacturing Best Practice programs in Australia and New Zealand.
Year of publication: |
2005-01
|
---|---|
Authors: | Cebon, Peter ; Love, E. Geoffrey |
Institutions: | College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Out of the Frying Pan and into the Mixing Bowl: Category Grading and the Adoption of Novel Practices
Cebon, Peter, (2006)
-
Love, E. Geoffrey, (2008)
-
Meanings on multiple levels : organizational culture and diffusion in institutionalized environments
Cebon, Peter B., (2003)
- More ...