Choosing the best volatility models: the model confidence set approach
This paper applies the model confidence sets (MCS) procedure to a set of volatility models. A MSC is analogous to a confidence interval of parameter in the sense that the former contains the best forecasting model with a certain probability. The key to the MCS is that it acknowledges the limitations of the information in the data. The empirical exercise is based on fifty-five volatility models, and the MCS includes about a third of these when evaluated by mean square error, whereas the MCS contains only a VGARCH model when mean absolute deviation criterion is used. We conduct a simulation study that shows the MCS captures the superior models across a range of significance levels. When we benchmark the MCS relative to a Bonferroni bound, this bound delivers inferior performance.
Year of publication: |
2003
|
---|---|
Authors: | Hansen, Peter Reinhard ; Lunde, Asger ; Nason, James M. |
Publisher: |
Atlanta, GA : Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta |
Saved in:
freely available
Series: | Working Paper ; 2003-28 |
---|---|
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Type of publication (narrower categories): | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Other identifiers: | hdl:10419/100842 [Handle] RePEc:fip:fedawp:2003-28 [RePEc] |
Source: |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010397513
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Testing the significance of calendar effects
Hansen, Peter Reinhard, (2005)
-
Model confidence sets for forecasting models
Hansen, Peter Reinhard, (2005)
-
Choosing the best volatility models: The model confidence set approach
Hansen, Peter Reinhard, (2003)
- More ...