Comparing the Costs of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity Generating Technologies
Economic evaluations of alternative electric generating technologies typically rely on comparisons between their expected "levelized cost" per MWh supplied. I demonstrate that this metric is inappropriate for comparing intermittent generating technologies like wind and solar with dispatchable generating technologies like nuclear, gas combined cycle, and coal. It overvalues intermittent generating technologies compared to dispatchable base load generating technologies. It also likely overvalues wind generating technologies compared to solar generating technologies. Integrating differences in production profiles, the associated variations in wholesale market prices of electricity, and life-cycle costs associated with different generating technologies is necessary to provide meaningful comparisons between them.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | Joskow, Paul L. |
Published in: |
American Economic Review. - American Economic Association - AEA. - Vol. 101.2011, 3, p. 238-41
|
Publisher: |
American Economic Association - AEA |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Incentive Regulation and Its Application to Electricity Networks
Joskow, Paul L., (2008)
-
Incentive Regulation for Electricity Networks
Joskow, Paul L., (2006)
-
Market Imperfections versus Regulatory Imperfections
Joskow, Paul L., (2010)
- More ...