Connecting and resolving Sen's and Arrow's theorems
It is shown that the source of Sen's and Arrow's impossibility theorems is that Sen's Liberal condition and Arrow's IIA counter the critical assumption that voters have transitive preferences. But if the procedures are not permitted to treat the transitivity of individual preferences as a valued input, then we cannot expect rational outputs. Once this common cause for these perplexing conclusions is understood, these classical conclusions end up admitting quite benign interpretations where it becomes possible to propose several resolutions.
Year of publication: |
1998-02-27
|
---|---|
Authors: | Saari, Donald G. |
Published in: |
Social Choice and Welfare. - Springer. - Vol. 15.1998, 2, p. 239-261
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Decisions and elections : explaining the unexpected
Saari, Donald, (2001)
-
Saari, Donald, (1994)
-
On the Design of Complex Organizations and Distributive Algorithms
Saari, Donald G., (1989)
- More ...