Credence Good Labeling: The Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Several Policy Approaches
A model of vertical product differentiation is used to analyze the labeling of credence goods, focusing on the manner by which quality is communicated. The results indicate that firms prefer private labeling options. In addition, firms may hire private certifiers as well as paying for mandated government labels when the government's quality benchmark substantially deviates from firms' private quality choices. The average consumer prefers a mandatory, discrete label with a high-quality standard while poor consumers prefer a mandatory, discrete label with a low standard. Copyright 2007 American Agricultural Economics Association.
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | Roe, Brian ; Sheldon, Ian |
Published in: |
American Journal of Agricultural Economics. - American Agricultural Economics Association. - Vol. 89.2007, 4, p. 1020-1033
|
Publisher: |
American Agricultural Economics Association |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Credence good labeling : the efficiency and distributional implications of several policy approaches
Roe, Brian, (2007)
-
Sheldon, Ian M., (2009)
-
Credence Good Labeling: The Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Several Policy Approaches
Roe, Brian, (2007)
- More ...