A crisis can affect the incentives of various players within a firm’s multi-layered sales and marketing organization (e.g., headquarters and branches of a bank). Such shifts can result in sales decisions against the firm’s best interests. Motivated by the backlash to the Paycheck Protection Program and the subsequent adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in the banking industry during the COVID-19 pandemic, we develop a model of decision authority allocation between headquarters and branches, then examine the impact of AI on decision authority and intra-organizational conflicts. Our model reveals how an increased concentration of decision authority at headquarters during a crisis can push the bank to focus on its largest clients and explains why such a strategy might not be beneficial. Furthermore, using AI does not always help the firm. When it replaces the branch’s due diligence efforts (e.g., Fintech firms), AI can mitigate intra-organizational conflict and enhance resource allocation. Yet when AI supplements the branch’s due diligence efforts (e.g., traditional banks), the branch might decrease its efforts and thus lower the bank’s information about the branch’s clients. AI can thus create new conflicts of interest and result in decision authority becoming concentrated at headquarters. This effect of AI is exacerbated during a crisis. Our findings have important implications for both practitioners and policy-makers that apply beyond the COVID-19 crisis