Crony Capitalism and Social Engineering : The Case Against Tax-Increment Financing
Tax-increment financing (TIF) is an increasingly popular way for cities to promote economic development. TIF works by allowing cities to use the property, sales, and other taxes collected from new developments — taxes that would otherwise go to schools, libraries, fire departments, and other urban services — to subsidize those same developments.While cities often claim that TIF is "free money" because it represents the taxes collected from developments that might not have taken place without the subsidy, there is plenty of evidence that this is not true. First, several studies have found that the developments subsidized by TIF would have happened anyway in the same urban area, though not necessarily the same location. Second, new developments impose costs on schools, fire departments, and other urban services, so other taxpayers must either pay more to cover those costs or accept a lower level of services as services are spread to developments that are not paying for them.Moreover, rather than promoting economic development, many if not most TIF subsidies are used for entirely different purposes. First, many states give cities enormous discretion for how they use TIF funds, turning TIF into a way for cities to capture taxes that would otherwise go to rival tax entities such as school or library districts. Second, no matter how well-intentioned, city officials will always be tempted to use TIF as a vehicle for crony capitalism, providing subsidies to developers who in turn provide campaign funds to politicians.Finally, many cities use TIF to persuade developers to build "new-urban" (high-density, mixed-use) developments that are supposedly greener than traditional designs but are less marketable than low-density suburbs. Albuquerque, Denver, Portland, and other cities have each spent hundreds of millions of dollars supporting such developments when developers would have been happy to build low-density developments without any subsidies.TIF takes money from schools, fire departments, libraries, and other urban services funded by property taxes. By eliminating TIF, state legislatures can help close current budget gaps and prevent cities from taking even more money from these urban services in the future
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | O'Toole, Randal |
Publisher: |
[2011]: [S.l.] : SSRN |
Saved in:
freely available
Extent: | 1 Online-Ressource (16 p) |
---|---|
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | In: Cato Institute Policy Analysis, No. 676 Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments May 18, 2011 erstellt |
Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013118454
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Unlivable strategies : the Greater Vancouver Regional District and the Livable Region Strategic Plan
O'Toole, Randal, (2007)
-
American nightmare : how government undermines the dream of homeownership
O'Toole, Randal, (2012)
-
Fixing Transit : The Case for Privatization
O'Toole, Randal, (2010)
- More ...