Democracy's Boundary Problem and the Paradox of Modern Sovereignty
In recent political theory, much attention has been paid to a basic problem of democratic politics: democracies cannot determine their own boundaries democratically. Although theorists such as Robert Dahl, Seyla Benhabib, and David Miller understand this problem to be exclusive to democratic theory and practice, I argue that it is not. Drawing upon the work of Machiavelli, Hobbes, Rousseau, and Sieyès, I argue that democracy's boundary problem is a particular expression of a paradoxical tension within modern ideals of sovereignty. Once this is understood, we can look to the history of sovereign statehood as a model for, or warning against, different ways to dissolve transnational versions of democracy's boundary problem. Inspired by Carol Gould, Étienne Balibar, and Bonnie Honig, I suggest that in order for democracy to outlive modern forms of sovereignty, the boundaries of democracies must become and remain sites of active democratic contestation
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | Whitt, Matt |
Publisher: |
[2011]: [S.l.] : SSRN |
Subject: | Souveränität | Sovereignty | Demokratie | Democracy | Welt | World |
Description of contents: | Abstract [papers.ssrn.com] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Rhodes, Carl, (2016)
-
Palley, Thomas I., (2021)
-
The EU and third countries : consequences for democracy and the political order
Fossum, John Erik, (2023)
- More ...