Derivative pricing model and time‐series approaches to hedging: A comparison
This research compares derivative pricing model and statistical time‐series approaches to hedging. The finance literature stresses the former approach, while the applied economics literature has focused on the latter. We compare the out‐of‐sample hedging effectiveness of the two approaches when hedging commodity price risk using futures contracts. For various methods of parameter estimation and inference, we find that the derivative pricing models cannot out‐perform a vector error‐correction model with a GARCH error structure. The derivative pricing models' unpalatable assumption of deterministically evolving futures volatility seems to impede their hedging effectiveness, even when potentially foresighted optionimplied volatility term structures are employed. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 25:613–641, 2005
Year of publication: |
2005
|
---|---|
Authors: | Bryant, Henry L. ; Haigh, Michael S. |
Published in: |
Journal of Futures Markets. - John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. - Vol. 25.2005, 7, p. 613-641
|
Publisher: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Estimating Actual Bid-Ask Spreads in Commodity Futures Markets
Bryant, Henry L., (2001)
-
BID-ASK SPREADS IN COMMODITY FUTURES MARKETS
Bryant, Henry L., (2002)
-
Disproving causal relationships using observational data
Bryant, Henry L., (2009)
- More ...