Cover Image

Design and Evaluation in eHealth: Challenges and Implications for an Interdisciplinary Field

Reviewer: Ammenwerth, Elske
Year of publication:
2007-05-27
Authors: Pagliari, Claudia
Publisher: Gunther Eysenbach; Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Toronto, Canada
Subject: Viewpoint | Medical informatics | software development | evaluation | interdisciplinarity
freely available
Open website |
doi.org
I need help
Type of publication: Other
Language: English
Notes:
Pagliari Claudia, Sloan David, Gregor Peter, Sullivan Frank, Detmer Don, Kahan James P, Oortwijn Wija, Macgillivray Steve. What is eHealth (4): a scoping exercise to map the field. J Med Internet Res 2005. Vol. 7(1) p. e9.
McConnell Harry. International efforts in implementing national health information infrastructure and electronic health records. World Hosp Health Serv 2004. Vol. 40(1) p. 33-37, 39-40, 50-2.
Department of Health. Delivering 21st Century IT Support for the NHS. National Strategic Programme Department of Health; London, UK. 2002.
Weingart P. Interdisciplinarity: the paradoxical discourse. In: Weingart P, Stehr N, editors. Practising Interdisciplinarity University of Toronto Press; Toronto, ON. 2000. p. 25-42.
Corn Milton, Rudzinski Karen A, Cahn Marjorie A. Bridging the gap in medical informatics and health services research: workshop results and next steps. J Am Med Inform Assoc Mar 2002. Vol. 9(2) p. 140-3.
Ammenwerth Elske, Brender Jytte, Nykänen Pirkko, Prokosch Hans-Ulrich, Rigby Michael, Talmon Jan. HIS-EVAL Workshop Participants. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inform Jun 30, 2004. Vol. 73(6) p. 479-91.
Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Scott Richard E. Striving for evidence in e-health evaluation: lessons from health technology assessment. J Telemed Telecare 2005. Vol. 11(Suppl 2) p. S34-S36.
Henderson J, Noell J, Reeves T, Robinson T, Strecher V. Developers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications. The Science Panel on Interactive Communications and Health. Am J Prev Med Jan 1999. Vol. 16(1) p. 30-4.
Shortliffe Edward H, Garber Alan M. Training synergies between medical informatics and health services research: successes and challenges. J Am Med Inform Assoc Mar 2002. Vol. 9(2) p. 133-9.
Mandl Kenneth D, Lee Thomas H. Integrating medical informatics and health services research: the need for dual training at the clinical health systems and policy levels. J Am Med Inform Assoc Mar 2002. Vol. 9(2) p. 127-32.
Grigsby Jim, Brega Angela G, Devore Patricia A. The evaluation of telemedicine and health services research. Telemed J E Health Jun 2005. Vol. 11(3) p. 317-28.
Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications--some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform Nov 2001. Vol. 64(1) p. 39-56.
Kaplan B, Brennan P F, Dowling A F, Friedman C P, Peel V. Toward an informatics research agenda: key people and organizational issues. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001. Vol. 8(3) p. 235-41.
Karsh B-T. Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care Oct 2004. Vol. 13(5) p. 388-94.
Southon G, Sauer C, Dampney K. Lessons from a failed information systems initiative: issues for complex organisations. Int J Med Inform Jul 1999. Vol. 55(1) p. 33-46.
Stumpf Steven H, Zalunardo Rod R, Chen Robert J. Barriers to telemedicine implementation. Usually it's not technology issues that undermine a project--it's everything else. Healthc Inform Apr 2002. Vol. 19(4) p. 45-8.
Lorenzi Nancy M. Beyond the gadgets. BMJ May 15, 2004. Vol. 328(7449) p. 1146-7.
Ammenwerth E, Shaw N T. Bad health informatics can kill--is evaluation the answer?. Methods Inf Med 2005. Vol. 44(1) p. 1-3.
Dumay A C M, Freriks G. Quality management issues for medical ICT. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004. Vol. 103 p. 93-100.
Johnston D, Pan E, Middleton B. The demonstrated value of healthcare IT: decision makers need hard evidence on all potential benefits. Healthc Inform 2003. p. 93-96.
Pagliari C, Gregor P, Sullivan F, Sloan D, McGillivray S, Ricketts I. Literature review and conceptual map of the area of e-health. Presentation at: Fourth National SDO Conference; April 27, London, UK 2005.
Chaudhry Basit, Wang Jerome, Wu Shinyi, Maglione Margaret, Mojica Walter, Roth Elizabeth, Morton Sally C, Shekelle Paul G. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med May 16, 2006. Vol. 144(10) p. 742-52.
Fitzgerald B. An empirical investigation into the adoption of systems development methodologies. Information & Management 1998. Vol. 34 p. 317-328.
Khoo B. A Survey of Major Software Design Methodologies. Khoo Homepage
Royce WW. Managing the Development of Large Software Systems. Proceedings of IEEE WESCON 1970. Vol. 26 p. 1-9.
Boehm BW. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer 1988. p. 61-72.
Hartson HR, Hix D. Toward empirically derived methodologies and tools for human-computer interface development. Int J Man Mach Stud 1989. Vol. 31(4) p. 477-494.
Laplante PA, Neill CJ. ACM 2004. Vol. 1(10)
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 13407:1999 (2004 version). Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. ISO
Thursky KA, Mahemoff M. User-centered design techniques for a computerised antibiotic decision support system in an intensive care unit. Int J Med Inform Sep 1, 2006.
Waller Annalu, Franklin Victoria, Pagliari Claudia, Greene Stephen. Participatory design of a text message scheduling system to support young people with diabetes. Health Informatics J Dec 2006. Vol. 12(4) p. 304-18.
Bowman M, Lopez A, Donlon K, Tecuci G. Teaching Intelligent Agents: Software Design Methodology. Crosstalk: J Defense Software Engineering 2001. Vol. 14(6) p. 10-14.
Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth A L, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ Sep 16, 2000. Vol. 321(7262) p. 694-6.
Zuber-Skerrit O. Models for action research. In: Pinchen S, Passfield R, editors. Moving On: Creative Applications of Action Learning and Action Research Action Research, Action Learning and Process Management; Queensland, Australia. 1995. p. 3-29.
Deming WE. Out of the Crisis MIT Press; Cambridge, MA. 2000.
How to Improve. Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Lewis W. Software Testing and Continuous Quality Improvement. 2nd edition CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL. 2000.
Kushniruk A W, Patel V L, Cimino J J. Usability testing in medical informatics: cognitive approaches to evaluation of information systems and user interfaces. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997. p. 218-22.
Jaspers M W M, Steen T. Cognitive engineering in interface design. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002. Vol. 90 p. 123-7.
Jaspers Monique W M, Steen Thiemo, Van Den Bos Cor, Geenen Maud. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. Int J Med Inform Nov 2004. Vol. 73(11-12) p. 781-95.
Friedman CP, Wyatt JC. Evaluation methods in biomedical informatics (Health informatics) Springer-Verlag; New York. 2006.
Coiera E, Westbrook J, Wyatt J. The safety and quality of decision support systems. Methods Inf Med 2006. Vol. 45 Suppl 1(suppl 1) p. 20-5.
Department of Trade and Industry. Competing in the Global Economy: The Innovation Challenge. Innovation Report. UK Department of Trade and Industry HMSO; London, UK. 2003.
Montgomery A A, Fahey T, Peters T J, Macintosh C, Sharp D J. Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ Mar 11, 2000. Vol. 320(7236) p. 686-90.
Machan C, Ammenweth E, Bodner T. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation literature: recognizing the problem, its impact and the causes. Conference paper 51. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie; September 14, 2006 2006. Vol. Leipzig, Germany. URL
Heathfield H, Pitty D, Hanka R. Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. BMJ Jun 27, 1998. Vol. 316(7149) p. 1959-61.
Gustafson David H, Wyatt Jeremy C. Evaluation of ehealth systems and services. BMJ May 15, 2004. Vol. 328(7449) p. 1150.
Ammenwerth E, De Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods Inf Med 2005. Vol. 44(1) p. 44-56.
Ewusi-Mensah K. Software Development Failures MIT Press; Cambridge, MA. 2003.
Eysenbach Gunther, Powell John, Kuss Oliver, Sa Eun-Ryoung. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002. Vol. 287(20) p. 2691-700.
Anderson Gerard F, Frogner Bianca K, Johns Roger A, Reinhardt Uwe E. Health care spending and use of information technology in OECD countries. Health Aff (Millwood) May 2006. Vol. 25(3) p. 819-31.
Clegg M. Commissioning evaluation: is there an enlightened approach?. Proceedings of the UK Evaluation Society Conference; December 2002. Vol. London, UK. URL
Pagliari Claudia. Implementing the National Programme for IT: what can we learn from the Scottish experience?. Inform Prim Care 2005. Vol. 13(2) p. 105-11.
DG Enterprise and Industry of the European Commission. Supporting the Monitoring and Evaluation of Innovation Programmes. A Study for DG Enterprise and Industry. Final Report DG Enterprise and Industry of the European Commission; Brussels-Luxembourg. 2006.
Other identifiers:
10.2196/jmir.9.2.e15 [DOI]
Source:
BASE
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009455317
Similar items by subject
Similar items by person