Does quarterly earnings guidance increase or reduce earnings management?
This study adds to the earnings guidance debate by investigating whether quarterly guidance is related to two forms of earnings management: (1) benchmark beating and (2) accounting irregularities. Using a post-Regulation Fair Disclosure sample, I find that firms regularly issuing earnings guidance display a discontinuity around zero in their distribution of management forecast errors and a larger discontinuity in their distribution of analyst forecast errors compared to non-guiding firms. Multivariate tests reveal that guiding firms recognize large abnormal accruals to beat their own guidance, but not to beat analyst forecasts, whereas non-guiding firms do recognize large abnormal accruals to beat analyst forecasts. Overall, guiding firms and non-guiding firms use similar levels of abnormal accruals to beat benchmarks. I also find no statistical relation between quarterly guidance and the likelihood of accounting irregularities. In sum, the evidence shows that while guiding firms and non-guiding firms manage earnings to different benchmarks, they are similar in terms of their aggregate earnings management.
Year of publication: |
2011-01-01
|
---|---|
Authors: | Acito, Andrew Alexei |
Publisher: |
Iowa Research Online |
Subject: | Earnings Guidance | Earnings Management | Business Administration, Management, and Operations |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
The impact of earnings guidance cessation on information asymmetry
Hu, Bill, (2014)
-
Strategic silence, insider seeling and litigation risk
Billings, Mary Brooke, (2015)
-
Does the cessation of quarterly earnings guidance reduce investors' short-termism?
Kim, Yongtae, (2017)
- More ...