Does the Need for Agreement Among Reviewers Inhibit the Publication of Controversial Findings?

Controversial empirical papers are expected to receive harsh treatment in peer review, but our survey indicates that such works occasionally get published, sometimes without much peer agreement. More can be done to encourage publication, however. We suggest ways to accomplish this, in particular, the use of an advocacy procedure that explicitly recognizes the need to promote this type of research

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2011
Authors:	Armstrong, J. Scott ; Hubbard, Raymond
Publisher:	[S.l.] : SSRN

freely available

Full text |

More access options

Check Google Scholar

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

More details
Report error

Extent:	1 Online-Ressource (4 p)
Type of publication:	Book / Working Paper
Language:	English
Notes:	In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 14, pp. 136-137, 1991
Source:	ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014028322