Duration neglect by numbers--And its elimination by graphs
People tend to neglect duration when retrospectively evaluating aversive experiences, causing memories to be at odds with experienced pain. However, memory was not involved in the original demonstration of duration neglect. Instead, people evaluated others' experiences represented by lists of discomfort ratings. Duration was said to be neglected because attention was focused on peak and end ratings. Three experiments are reported demonstrating that graphs rather than number lists can make duration neglect disappear without increasing attention to episode duration. Graphs can eliminate duration neglect because, relative to number lists, strategies that incorporate duration are more easily employed. The results suggest that when hedonic information does not have to be remembered, people will use all, not just peak and end, moments when evaluating experiences, and that format presentation affects how people combine those moments. Caution is recommended when making theoretical and prescriptive generalizations based on duration neglect.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Liersch, Michael J. ; McKenzie, Craig R.M. |
Published in: |
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. - Elsevier, ISSN 0749-5978. - Vol. 108.2009, 2, p. 303-314
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Duration neglect Peak/end rule Hedonic experience Heuristics Biases |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Overconfidence in interval estimates: What does expertise buy you?
McKenzie, Craig R.M., (2008)
-
People believe that they are prototypically good or bad
Roy, Michael M., (2013)
-
Are longshots only for losers? : a new look at the last race effect
McKenzie, Craig R. M., (2016)
- More ...