Elimination of Social Security in a Dynastic Framework
Much of the existing literature on social security has taken the extreme assumption that individuals have little or no altruism; this paper takes an opposite assumption that there is full two-sided altruism. When households insure members that belong to the same family line, privatizing social security can gain public support. In our benchmark model calibrated to the U.S. economy, privatization without compensation is favoured by 52% of the population. If social security participants are fully compensated for their contributions, and the transition to privatization is financed by a combination of debt and a consumption tax, 58% experience a welfare gain. These gains and the resulting public support for social security reform depend critically on a flexible labour market. If the labour supply elasticity is low, then support for privatization disappears. Copyright 2007, Wiley-Blackwell.
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | Fuster, Luisa ; İmrohoroğlu, Ayşe ; İmrohoroğlu, Selahattin |
Published in: |
Review of Economic Studies. - Oxford University Press. - Vol. 74.2007, 1, p. 113-145
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Personal security accounts and mandatory annuitization in a dynastic framework
Fuster, Luisa, (2005)
-
Elimination of social security in a dynastic framework
Fuster, Luisa, (2007)
-
A welfare analysis of social security in a dynastic framework
Fuster, Luisa, (2003)
- More ...