Embrace the differences : revisiting the PollyVote method of combining forecasts for U.S. presidential elections (2004 to 2020)
Year of publication: |
2023
|
---|---|
Authors: | Graefe, Andreas |
Published in: |
International journal of forecasting. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, ISSN 0169-2070, ZDB-ID 283943-X. - Vol. 39.2023, 1, p. 170-177
|
Subject: | Combining forecasts | Election forecasting | Evaluating forecasts | Monitoring forecasts | Political forecasting | USA | United States | Prognoseverfahren | Forecasting model | Wahlverhalten | Voting behaviour | Präsidentschaftswahl | Presidential election | Prognose | Forecast | Wahl | Election |
-
Forecasting the 2020 and 2024 U.S. presidential elections
Walker, David, (2023)
-
The wisdom of crowds : applying Condorcet's jury theorem to forecasting US presidential elections
Murr, Andreas E., (2015)
-
Prediction markets vs polls : an examination of accuracy for the 2008 and 2012 elections
Arnesen, Sveinung, (2014)
- More ...
-
Prediction Markets versus Alternative Methods. Empirical Tests of Accuracy and Acceptability
Graefe, Andreas, (2009)
-
Predicting Elections from Biographical Information about Candidates: A Test of the Index Method
Armstrong, J. Scott, (2010)
-
Methods to Elicit Forecasts from Groups: Delphi and Prediction Markets Compared
Green, Kesten C, (2007)
- More ...