Evaluation of the Dublin III Regulation : Final report

In line with the Terms of Reference, the aims of the Dublin III Evaluation are threefold: To study and provide an in-depth analysis (article-by-article) on the practical implementation of the ‘Dublin III Regulation’in all Member States (phase 1); To evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, consistency and EU added value of the Dublin III Regulation (phase 2);and, To identify potential elements inwhich the Dublin III Regulation could be amended (phase 3). This report feeds into phase 2 of the Study and constitutes the ‘Final Evaluation Report’. It provides an overview of the answers to the evaluation questions included in the Terms of Reference of the Study based on the evidence collected from 19 Member States. The report should be read in conjunction with the Final Implementation Report.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2015-12-04
Other Persons:	Jurado, Elena (contributor) ; Maas, Sheila (contributor) ; Capdevila, Mathieu (contributor)
Institutions:	ICF International ; Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres (contributor)
Subject:	Asylrecht \| right of asylum \| Asylverfahren \| asylum procedure \| Drittländer \| third countries \| EU \| Rechtsanwendung \| legal usage \| Verwaltungsverfahren \| administrative procedure

Check Google Scholar |

More access options

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

1 Introduction
1.1 Aim of the study and purpose of the report
1.2 Methodology.
1.3 Structure of the report
2 Relevance of Dublin III Regulation
2.1 The relevance of establishing a method for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection
2.2 The relevance of a legal framework codifying the method for determining the responsible Member State
2.3 Relevance of Dublin III’s building blocks to achieving its general and specific objectives
3 The effectiveness of the Dublin III Regulation
3.1 Objective 1: To establish a clear and workable method
3.2 Objective 2: To guarantee swift access to the asylum procedure (and prevent the phenomenon of asylum seekers in orbit)
3.3 Objective 3: To prevent applicants for international protection from pursuing multiple applications in different Member States (thereby reducing secondary movements of asylum seekers)
3.4 Objective 4: To ensure an equitable distribution of applicants for and beneficiaries of international protection between Member States
4 The efficiency of the Dublin III Regulation
4.1 The direct and indirect costs of implementing the Dublin III procedure
4.2 Are the costs justified?
5 Coherence and complementarity
5.1Conformity of the Dublin III Regulation with fundamental rights
5.2 Conformity of the Dublin III Regulation with other treaty rules
5.3 Coherence and complementarity with the EU acquis
6 EU added value
Annex 1 Tables and figures
Annex 2 Methodological note on the efficiency of the Dublin III Regulation

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012056090