Evidence on the insurance effect of bankruptcy exemptions
Defaulting on one's debts when experiencing an adverse event can help insure households against unexpected income risks. But the effect of allowing default on debt levels is ambiguous, not least because lenders may restrict access to credit. Hence the optimal punishment for bankruptcy is unclear. The US states allows householders to keep a variety of assets when filing for bankruptcy - the 'bankruptcy exemptions' - and these exemptions change substantially between states and over time. By exploiting these differences this study shows that raising the exemptions (i) marginally decreases the level of unsecured debt that household's hold; (ii) makes consumption smoother. Thus, despite the effect on debt levels, the generous provisions to debtors in arrears may be helping US households to insure themselves against income risk.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Grant, Charles |
Published in: |
Journal of Banking & Finance. - Elsevier, ISSN 0378-4266. - Vol. 34.2010, 9, p. 2247-2254
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Subject: | Consumption Bankruptcy law Debt Insurance |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Redistributive Taxation and Personal Bankruptcy in US States
Grant, Charles, (2005)
-
Evidence on the Insurance Effect of Redistributive Taxation
Grant, Charles, (2006)
-
Evidence on the Insurance Effect of Redistributive Taxation
Koulovatianos, Christos,
- More ...