Experimental and Conceptual Innovators in the Sciences: The Cases of Darwin and Einstein
During the past decade, analyses of artistic creativity have demonstrated the contrast in creative life cycles between experimental old masters and conceptual young geniuses. This article extends the analysis to scientists. Charles Darwin was a great experimental innovator, who spent decades accumulating evidence on evolution and its mechanisms, and made his greatest contributions late in his career. In contrast, Albert Einstein was a great conceptual innovator, who made discoveries through highly abstract reasoning, and made his greatest contributions early in his career. The careers of these two great scientists are thus consistent with the thesis that, as in the arts, conceptual creativity is associated with youth, but experimental creativity increases with age.
Year of publication: |
2013
|
---|---|
Authors: | Galenson, David W. ; Pope, Clayne L. |
Published in: |
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0161-5440. - Vol. 46.2013, 2, p. 102-112
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Galenson, David W., (1989)
-
Precedence and Wealth: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Utah
Galenson, David W.,
-
Precedence and Wealth: Evidence from Nineteenth Century Utah
Galenson, David W., (1991)
- More ...