Factor productivity and technical change
This paper deals with (i) decomposing total factor productivity growth into input-specific components, (ii) measuring input-specific productivity/efficiency growth, and (iii) testing several neutrality hypotheses in technical change. These issues are addressed in a general framework without assuming any functional form on the underlying production technology, and without imposing any structure on the behaviour of input productivity/efficiency growth. Using NBER panel data on 450 U.S. manufacturing industries for the period 1959--1992, it is found that technical change can be characterized by neither Hicks, Harrod, nor Solow neutral form. It is also found that productivity of capital has increased, on average by 6.5%, whereas those of labour and material declined by 5.10% and 0.4%, respectively.
| Year of publication: |
2003
|
|---|---|
| Authors: | Kumbhakar, Subal C. |
| Published in: |
Applied Economics Letters. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1350-4851. - Vol. 10.2003, 5, p. 291-297
|
| Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Kumbhakar, Subal, (2000)
-
Production frontiers and panel data : an application to U.S. class 1 railroads
Kumbhakar, Subal C., (1987)
-
Efficiency and productivity of world health systems : where does your country stand?
Kumbhakar, Subal, (2010)
- More ...