Fairness and Competence in Democratic Decisions.
The price system is generally thought to be the epitome of efficiency. In some cases, however, lotteries are preferred to the market as a social decision-making system for reasons of fairness. As recent research has shown, neither procedure is always well accepted among the general population. The authors analyze the social acceptability of both mechanisms and apply their framework to the allocation of social burdens, namely the sighting of nuclear waste facilities. Lotteries are only acceptable if they are applied to a set of efficient options. The market is accepted if the production of fairness precedes the use of prices. Copyright 1997 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Year of publication: |
1997
|
---|---|
Authors: | Oberholzer-Gee, Felix ; Bohnet, Iris ; Frey, Bruno S |
Published in: |
Public Choice. - Springer. - Vol. 91.1997, 1, p. 89-105
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out.
Frey, Bruno S, (1997)
-
The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets.
Frey, Bruno S, (1996)
-
Direct-Democratic Rules: The Role of Discussion.
Bohnet, Iris, (1994)
- More ...