Federalism and the Safety Net: Delinkage and Participation Rates
Since the enactment of welfare reform legislation in 1996, the federal government and the states have emphasized putting the needy to work and reducing caseloads. Simultaneously, however, national policymakers delinked eligibility for cash assistance from eligibility for other safety-net benefits. Contrary to stated policy, though, this delinkage has led to declining participation in the case of Food Stamps and health-insurance programs for low-income children. We highlight four factors that states must shape if they are to narrow this gap between policy promise and program performance by fostering higher participation. We show how our focus intersects with enduring questions of American federalism—the level of state commitment to redistributive programs, their capacity to implement these programs effectively, and the degree to which states can augment governing capacity by becoming more genuine laboratories of democracy. Copyright , Oxford University Press.
Authors: | Thompson, Frank J. ; Gais, Thomas L. |
---|---|
Published in: |
Publius: The Journal of Federalism. - Oxford University Press, ISSN 0048-5950. - Vol. 30, 1, p. 119-142
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Stretched Net: The Retrenchment of State and Local Social Welfare Spending Before the Recession
Gais, Thomas L., (2009)
-
The Social Safety Net, Health Care, and the Great Recession
Gais, Thomas L., (2012)
-
The Shadow Welfare State: Labor, Business, and the Politics of Health Care in the United States
Thompson, Frank J., (2001)
- More ...