Flexible `Parts' and Rigid `Fulls': The Limited Revolution in Work-Time Patterns
The evidence indicates that there has been some erosion of the distinction between part-time and full-time employment over the past decade. However, this is almost entirely attributable to the growth in part-time employment, and despite a continuing rigidity in full-time work patterns. It is argued that part-time employment can only make a limited contribution to labour market flexibility so long as full-time work patterns remain inflexible. This paper questions the assumptions sustaining a rigid bifurcation of work into full-time and part-time hours, and considers the case for a more flexible approach to full-time hours in the context of the debate over worksharing.
Year of publication: |
1989
|
---|---|
Authors: | Dey, Ian |
Published in: |
Work, Employment & Society. - British Sociological Association. - Vol. 3.1989, 4, p. 465-490
|
Publisher: |
British Sociological Association |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Redundancy : case studies in co-operation and conflict
Wood, Stephen, (1983)
-
Distance education and training for small firms : United Kingdom
Dey, Ian, (1988)
-
Computer-based qualitative data analysis
Dey, Ian, (2000)
- More ...