"Fortune's" Best 100 Companies to Work for in America: Do They Work for Shareholders?
In this paper we examine the market reaction to the announcement by "Fortune" of the 'Best 100 Companies to Work for in America.' Employees rate firms based on several criteria including trust in management, pride in work/company and camaraderie. To examine long-term performance, we calculate raw and risk-adjusted returns and then compare them to the returns of a matched sample of firms. In addition, we calculate the return on a buy and hold investment in the sample firm less the return on a buy-and-hold investment in a matched sample firm (BHARs). We find a statistically significant positive response to the announcement of the '100 best companies to work for' by "Fortune". Also, based on all measures of risk-adjusted return, we find these firms generally outperform the matched sample of companies. The BHAR results, although not exhibiting the level of statistical significance, are consistent with the raw and risk-adjusted return results. Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2003.
Year of publication: |
2003-06
|
---|---|
Authors: | Filbeck, Greg ; Preece, Dianna |
Published in: |
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. - Wiley Blackwell, ISSN 0306-686X. - Vol. 30.2003-06, 5-6, p. 771-797
|
Publisher: |
Wiley Blackwell |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Bond ratings and bank loan announcements : the effect on equity prices
Boscaljon, Brian, (2008)
-
Community banks and deposit market share growth
Filbeck, Greg, (2010)
-
Top performing banks : size effect and economic cycles
Filbeck, Greg, (2011)
- More ...