Framing Lifetime Income
Jeffrey R. Brown, Jeffrey R. Kling, Sendhil Mullainathan, Marian V. Wrobel
We provide evidence that individuals optimize imperfectly when making annuity decisions, and this result is not driven by loss aversion. Life annuities are more attractive when presented in a consumption frame than in an investment frame. Highlighting the purchase price in the consumption frame does not alter this result. The level of habitual spending has little interaction with preferences for annuities in the consumption frame. In an investment frame, consumers prefer annuities with principal guarantees; this result is similar for guarantee amounts below, at, and above the purchase price. We discuss implications for the retirement services industry and its regulators
Year of publication: |
May 2013
|
---|---|
Authors: | Brown, Jeffrey R. |
Other Persons: | Kling, Jeffrey R. (contributor) ; Wrobel, Marian V. (contributor) ; Mullainathan, Sendhil (contributor) |
Institutions: | National Bureau of Economic Research (contributor) |
Publisher: |
Cambridge, Mass : National Bureau of Economic Research |
Subject: | Konsumentenverhalten | Consumer behaviour | Prospect Theory | Prospect theory | Private Altersvorsorge | Private retirement provision | Lebensversicherung | Life insurance | Lebenseinkommen | Lifetime income |
Saved in:
freely available
Extent: | 1 Online-Ressource |
---|---|
Series: | NBER working paper series ; no. w19063 |
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | Mode of access: World Wide Web System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers. |
Other identifiers: | 10.3386/w19063 [DOI] |
Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012459598