Freedom and Autonomy
Unlike its US counterpart, the German Constitution offers all-encompassing protection; in American jargon German law thus is in the Lochner era. But this generosity only applies to individual freedom, not to private governance. There are select guarantees of governance too, as for the churches and the universities. But according to general wisdom, these guarantees are enumerative. This paper challenges the general wisdom. It claims two things: there is a general protection of private governance, enshrined in Basic Law, Article 9. And a constitutional guarantee of governance is fundamentally different from the guarantees of freedom. Both classes of guarantees have in common that they protect against governmental intervention. Consequently, they also share the basic doctrinal properties: to violate the protection, the governmental act must intervene in an activity protected by the constitutional provision, and the intervention must fail the test of proportionality. But governance is protected as an activity. Government intervenes if private governance is prevented or impeded. Such intervention can be indirect, and therefore encompass internal organisation of the private governance body, or its access to resources. Yet neither the body's property nor its potential for making money are protected directly by the pertinent constitutional freedoms. Moreover, the proportionality principle has to be applied in a way that pays due respect to the fact that private governance by definition encroaches upon the individual freedom of its addressees
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Engel, Christoph |
Publisher: |
[S.l.] : SSRN |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Tacit collusion: The neglected experimental evidence
Engel, Christoph, (2015)
-
Bargaining in the absence of property rights: An experiment
Bar-Gill, Oren, (2015)
-
If the worst comes to the worst: Dictator giving when recipientĀ“s endowments are risky
Engel, Christoph, (2015)
- More ...