Frequency of monotonicity failure under Instant Runoff Voting: estimates based on a spatial model of elections
It has long been recognized that Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) suffers from a defect known as nonmonotonicity, wherein increasing support for a candidate among a subset of voters may adversely affect that candidate’s election outcome. The expected frequency of this type of behavior, however, remains an open and important question, and limited access to detailed election data makes it difficult to resolve empirically. In this paper, we develop a spatial model of voting behavior to approach the question theoretically. We conclude that monotonicity failures in three-candidate IRV elections may be much more prevalent than widely presumed (results suggest a lower bound estimate of 15 % for competitive elections). In light of these results, those seeking to implement a fairer multi-candidate election system should be wary of adopting IRV. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Ornstein, Joseph ; Norman, Robert |
Published in: |
Public Choice. - Springer. - Vol. 161.2014, 1, p. 1-9
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Subject: | Voting theory | Instant Runoff Voting | Agent-based modeling | Monotonicity |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Ornstein, Joseph T., (2014)
-
Voting and the Cardinal Aggregation of Judgments
Hillinger, Claude, (2004)
-
On the Possibility of Democracy and Rational Collective Choice
Hillinger, Claude, (2004)
- More ...
Similar items by person