From the 'econometrics of capital punishment' to the 'capital punishment' of econometrics: on the use and abuse of sensitivity analysis
The academic debate over the deterrent effect of capital punishment has intensified again with a major policy outcome at stake. About two dozen empirical studies have recently emerged that explore the issue. Donohue and Wolfers (2005) claim to have examined the recent studies and shown the evidence not to be robust to specification changes. We argue that the narrow scope of their study does not warrant this claim. Moreover, focusing on our two studies that they have examined, we show the deterrence findings to be robust, while their work has serious flaws and their reporting appears to be selective. The selectivity is biased towards showing 'no deterrence'.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | Dezhbakhsh, Hashem ; Rubin, Paul |
Published in: |
Applied Economics. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0003-6846. - Vol. 43.2011, 25, p. 3655-3670
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Dezhbakhsh, Hashem, (2007)
-
The limits of the equity-efficiency tradeoff
Keenan, Donald, (1985)
-
Public interest lobbies: membership and influence
Kau, James, (1979)
- More ...