Geography versus brands in a global wine market
Producer brands increasingly dominate global wine markets, while generic advertising promotes regionality and exports (e.g., Australia, Spain). We analyze U.S. price data and quality indicators for 24 wine regions within 11 countries using a hedonic model. We assess the value of producer brands vs. geographical indicators, defining an indicator for high, average, and low quality producers (brands) within a region based on relative peer performance, i.e., whether they consistently produce qualities above or below their regional average. In contrast to high quality producers from France and Italy, their counterparts from the New World never exceed prices for high quality Napa Valley brands. Thus, New World wine still has to catch up with the Old World in terms of regional reputation, but leading brands are able to pick up much of the price differential. Generic promotions, export quality controls, and regional quality leaders emphasizing origin in their own marketing may level the playing field for laggard regions. [EconLit citations: D400, Q130, L140]. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Agribusiness 22: 363-374, 2006.
Year of publication: |
2006
|
---|---|
Authors: | Schamel, Günter |
Published in: |
Agribusiness. - John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., ISSN 0742-4477. - Vol. 22.2006, 3, p. 363-374
|
Publisher: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Agricultural trade and the environment : domestic versus global perspectives
Schamel, Günter, (1997)
-
Individual and collective reputation indicators of wine quality
Schamel, Günter, (2000)
-
More on welfare effects of distortions via environmental and trade policy
Schamel, Günter, (2000)
- More ...