Growth, Import Dependence and War
Existing theories of pre-emptive war typically predict that the leading country may choose to launch a war on a follower who is catching up, since the follower cannot credibly commit to not use their increased power in the future. But it was Japan who launched a war against the West in 1941, not the West that pre-emptively attacked Japan. Similarly, many have argued that trade makes war less likely, yet World War I erupted at a time of unprecedented globalization. This paper develops a theoretical model of the relationship between trade and war which can help to explain both these observations. Dependence on strategic imports can lead follower nations to launch pre-emptive wars when they are potentially subject to blockade.
Year of publication: |
2014-07-25
|
---|---|
Authors: | O'Rourke, Kevin Hjortshøj ; Bonfatti, Roberto |
Institutions: | Department of Economics, Oxford University |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Trade and the Pattern of European Imperialism, 1492-2000
Bonfatti, Roberto, (2012)
-
An Economic Theory of Foreign Interventions and Regime Change
Bonfatti, Roberto, (2011)
-
O'Rourke, Kevin Hjortshøj, (2011)
- More ...