Have the tax benefits of debt been overestimated?
We re-examine the claim that many corporations are underleveraged in that they fail to take full advantage of debt tax shields. We show prior results suggesting underleverage stems from biased estimates of tax benefits from interest deductions. We develop improved estimates of marginal tax rates using a non-parametric procedure that produces more accurate estimates of the distribution of future taxable income. We show that additional debt would provide firms with much smaller tax benefits than previously thought, and when expected distress costs and difficult-to-measure non-debt tax shields are also considered, it appears plausible that most firms have tax-efficient capital structures.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Blouin, Jennifer ; Core, John E. ; Guay, Wayne |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial Economics. - Elsevier, ISSN 0304-405X. - Vol. 98.2010, 2, p. 195-213
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Debt Capital structure Marginal tax rates Taxes |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Have the tax benefits of debt been overestimated?
Blouin, Jennifer L., (2010)
-
Tax aggressiveness and corporate transparency
Balakrishnan, Karthik, (2019)
-
Does tax aggressiveness reduce financial reporting transparency?
Balakrishnan, Karthik, (2011)
- More ...